<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
   <channel>
      <title>North Carolina Personal Injury Law Advocate - Newspaper series reveals House of Raeford hid worker injuries, refused medical treatment - Comments</title>
      <link>http://blog.deutermanlaw.com/</link>
      <description>Workers Compensation and Social Security Lawyer and Attorney Dan Deuterman : Personal Injury, Disability</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2011</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:55:23 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:55:23 -0500</pubDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=4.32-en</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
         <title>Brian Heyler</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I am surprised to see no comments on this story. After seeing the report on the Bill Moyer's Journal it struck me that the real culprits here are the attorneys representing Raeford's interests in compensation. I would like to know who they are and how far reaching their illegal advice might be.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.deutermanlaw.com/workers-compensation-cases/workers-rights/newspaper-series-reveals-house-of-raeford-hid-worker-injuries-refused-medical-treatment/#16894</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.deutermanlaw.com/workers-compensation-cases/workers-rights/newspaper-series-reveals-house-of-raeford-hid-worker-injuries-refused-medical-treatment/#16894</guid>
         <category domain="http://blog.deutermanlaw.com/workers-compensation-cases">Workers&apos; Rights</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 09:33:32 -0500</pubDate>
         <dc:creator>Dan Deuterman</dc:creator>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
