New law hurts auto accident victims in lawsuits

Insurance companies scored a major victory – and a major financial windfall – with legislation that recently passed the N.C. General Assembly.

The new law, part of House Bill 542, will impact everyone who is injured in a car accident that was someone else’s fault. The new law effectively penalizes injured people who have health coverage through private insurance, Medicaid or Medicare by reducing the amount of money they can recover in a personal injury settlement or jury award.

This particular unfair portion of the law is known as the billed versus paid provision and it relates to a complicated rule of evidence used in trials. It’s easiest to understand through an example.

Next time you visit the doctor and pay with insurance, take a look at the statement you receive in the mail from the insurance company. Chances are, the insurance company paid a “negotiated rate” – less than the doctor’s standard rate to settle the bill. What was paid was different than what was billed.

Before H542 became law, defendants in personal injury cases weren’t allowed to tell the jury if the injured person’s health insurance, Medicare or Medicaid picked up part of the tab. But now, the rules have changed – in favor of the insurance companies and against injured people.

When someone causes an accident, they’re liable for the damages and injuries they cause. The responsible party’s level of liability should not change based on whether the injured person has health insurance or not. But that’s exactly what this new law does.

"The Republican-led majority has said with this bill that it's OK for people who hurt others to benefit from their victims,” said Todd Barlow of the N.C. Advocates for Justice. “And they've extended that privilege to insurance companies."

Consider this example:

You and your best friend are driving to lunch when you’re rear-ended by another driver. You both suffer identical neck injuries, requiring months of medical treatment totaling $10,000. In fact, the only difference is you have health insurance and your friend does not.

Your health insurance kicks in to pay $5,000 of your $10,000 in medical bills, leaving you $5,000 to pay.

Because your friend has no health insurance, the other driver’s auto insurance pays her $10,000 to settle her medical claim. Meanwhile, you’re only entitled to a $5,000 settlement, even though your injuries were exactly the same! The auto insurance company just pocketed $5,000 of your money because your health insurance covered half of the bill.

That’s not fair!

What’s really unfair about this new law is that it gives insurance companies an advantage in court. Their attorneys can tell the jury that an injured person had health insurance that helped pay their medical bills, thereby reducing the amount of money that person can collect in court.

But injured people aren’t allowed to tell the jury that the responsible driver has auto insurance that will kick in to cover any damages. As a result, jurors often believe that the other driver will be on the hook and will have to pay out of pocket for any damages. But in nearly every auto accident lawsuit, it’s the insurance company that will end up paying the bill – not the at-fault driver.

This new law is just another example of who really benefits from so-called “tort reform.” The insurance companies continue to take money out of the pockets of innocent victims.

End distracted driving -- turn off your phone

Texting while driving is dangerous. Deadly even.

We'd like to encourage all drivers to participate in Two-Second Turnoff today -- and every day after -- every time you get behind the wheel of a car.

Two-Second Turnoff Day is a joint campaign by Seventeen magazine, the U.S. Department of Transportation and AAA aimed at getting drivers to turn off their phones every time they get behind the wheel.

The majority of teen drivers recognize that texting and talking on the phone while driving is dangerous, according to research by Seventeen. But the majority of them still text while driving. We're better that many adults are also guilty of distracted driving, even though they know the risks.

Two seconds is all it takes to save a life -- or to destroy it:

Taking your eyes off the road for just two seconds doubles your risk for a crash. But it also takes just two seconds to shut down your phone—and prevent an accident.

Make it a habit to turn off your phone whenever you get in the car, so you can focus your attention on the road and on getting to your destination safely.

Participate in Two-Second Turnoff Day -- today, tomorrow and everyday. If you're on Facebook, RSVP to this life-saving event and help spread the word to your friends.

We also have to share this silly -- but catchy -- rap from an Augusta, Ga., teenager who won Seventeen's Two-Second Turnoff video contest. "Eyes on the road, hands on 10 and 2. Not gonna get the text about what happened last night with Billy at the drive-in... Get to where you're going, then text back..."

 

 

Lawsuits and Auto Safety Innovations

Many of the safety features now standard in cars are there because of the work of attorneys who advocate for consumer safety.

The American Association for Justice has an eye-opening report about how lawsuits filed on behalf of injured people and their families have resulted in such auto safety innovations as air bags,  side impact protection and electronic stability control, to name just a few.

The graphic below shows how lawsuits against automakers have made our vehicles safer. An interactive version of the graphic is available on AAJ's web site. There, when you roll over the numbers, you'll see pop-up explanations of safety improvements with information on the lawsuits that led to them.

carbg1.jpg

Sharing the Road - Safety Tips for Cyclists and Drivers

Tomorrow, Grayson Dawson of Eden is set to plead guilty in the hit-and-run death of cyclist David Sherman.

Sherman's death and the circumstances surrounding it have brought a lot of attention locally to cyclists rights and the dangers facing cyclists on our roadways. That's one positive that has come from this horrible tragedy.

According to the League of American Bicyclists, close to 800 cyclists are killed every year and another 43,000 are injured every year in crashes with motorists. These types of bike deaths and injuries are far too common -- and most are preventable.

Just last week, 27-year-old Ronald Wayne Branch Jr., died after his bike was hit by a car. The car's driver, James Jerome Bridges of Eden, has been charged with felony hit and run and misdemeanor death by motor vehicle.

According to news reports in the News & Record: 

According to witnesses, Ronald Wayne Branch Jr., 27, of Lee Street, was riding his bicycle south on Bird Street [in Ruffin] and was struck by a 1992 Nissan at Maryland Avenue.

The motorist failed to stop and continued driving east, fleeing the scene. Branch was taken to Morehead Memorial Hospital where he was pronounced dead on arrival.

Officers said alcohol did not appear to be a factor in the incident. Branch was wearing dark clothes and no helmet, and witnesses said he neglected to stop at a stop sign,

It's time that we all get serious about cyclist safety and sharing the road. This applies whether you're pedaling or behind the wheel.

Here are some tips from Greensboro Department of Transportation on sharing the road:

For cyclists:

  • All traffic laws apply to bicyclists:
    • Stop at red lights
    • Yield right-of-way
    • Signal when turning
    • Ride on the road in the same direction as traffic
  • Wear a helmet.
  • At night, wear reflective clothing and use bicycle lights.
  • Ride on the right side of the road, but stay away from the edge of the pavement.
  • Avoid riding on sidewalks. At driveways and street crossings, motorists may not see you on the sidewalk until it's too late.
  • Pass on the left.
  • Watch for cars turning into bike lanes.
  • Obey signs that prohibit riding (such as on interstate highways).
  • Look for bicyclists before turning and before opening doors.
  • Do not overtake a bicyclist before making a right turn. Instead, slow down, merge, and then turn.
  • Do not assume that a bicyclist will ride as far to the right as possible. Good cyclists ride about three feet from the edge of the road, which makes them more visible to motorists and gives them space to maneuver around road hazards.
  • Allow bicyclists to enter your lane to make a left turn.
  • Remember that bicycles are vehicles and are allowed to ride on the roads.
  • Do not drive or park in bike lanes. You may, however, cross them when turning or exiting a legally assigned parking space.

Additional tips for cyclists are available here, here, here and here. SafeGuilford has links on how to choose and fit a bike helmet.

Drivers should check out these links: Yield To Life, the Bike League and the UNC Highway Safety Research Center.

Remember to Drive Safely When Part of a Caravan

We were saddened this week to hear the news of two North Carolina students who were killed in a car accident this week on their way to a college orientation program. One of those who died was Arielle Parker, a promising, talented and much loved young woman from Greensboro.

The students were traveling in a caravan when the accident occurred, with one car following another to a ropes obstacle course near the Wingate University campus. Driver Mishawn Miller, who also died, ran a stop sign and the students' car was hit by an oncoming grain truck. Two other students in Miller's car were injured.

It's not clear from news reports what caused Miller to miss the stop sign, but residents who live near the scene of the accident say it's a dangerous intersection. They've called for better signage and other safety features to prevent future accidents.

One lesson from this tragic story is that we all need to be more attentive drivers. We're not going to speculate about what went on in Miller's car and what might have caused him to miss the stop sign at the intersection.

But we do know from personal experience that it's easy to make mistakes when you're driving as part of a caravan and when you have lots of passengers in the car with you.

Think about the last time you were following someone else to an unfamiliar location. Were you as focused on following safe driving rules and the traffic around you? Or were you more concerned with losing sight of the caravan leader and getting lost?

I'd bet that we've all taken some unnecessary risks -- speeding through a yellow light, perhaps? -- to keep up with another car. So dangerous.

I found an article on convoy safety that is aimed at members of car clubs, but some of the tips are useful to any of us who find ourselves following along behind someone.

  • Make sure every driver has directions to where you're going. These days, many drivers have GPS systems in their cars. Or you can print directions from Google Maps.
  • Treat stop signs and stop lights as you would if you weren't traveling in a caravan. Come to a complete stop at stop signs and check for oncoming traffic before proceeding through the intersection. Don't try to "make the light" just to keep up with the driver in front of you.
  • If you're leading a convoy or caravan, pay attention to the car behind you. Pace your speed to that car's speeding. If the person following you falls behind or off course, find a safe place to pull over so he can catch up.
  • Signal all turns early and relentlessly.
  • Favor the right (slow) lane when on a four-lane highway.
  • Use common sense. Drive as though you are an individual following a planned route and map, rather than a participant of a group. 

Remember, while getting lost isn't fun, it's much better than losing your life or taking someone else's through unsafe and inattentive driving.

DLG withdraws support for HB 813; compromises could be harmful to injured people

We recently asked you to write to your state senators in support of legislation that would change how automobile accident claims and other personal injury cases are handled in court.

While we still believe that North Carolina's use of contributory negligence in personal injury cases is antiquated, harsh and punishes injured people, we can no longer support the version of HB 813 now being debated by state lawmakers. Quite simply, some the the provisions that have been added to the bill as it has made its way through the N.C. General Assembly do not protect the interests of injured people.

So, we must join the N.C. Advocates for Justice in withdrawing our support for HB 813.

As a law firm that advocates for injured people, we still believe that North Carolina must move away from contributory negligence and toward comparative fault in these cases, the compromise bill currently proposed sacrifices too much

North Carolina is one of only four states that allow the doctrine of contributory negligence as a defense in auto accident and other personal injury cases. Contributory negligence is a harsh and outdated way of denying help to people hurt in accidents. Under current law, if you’re even 1 percent responsible for an accident, you CANNOT recover damages from the person who injured you, even if that person is 99 percent at fault.

The original HB 813, which we supported, sought to correct that injustice by switching from contributory negligence to comparative fault. Under the comparative fault doctrine, juries determine how much fault lies with each party in the accident and then award damages based on those percentages. The injured party is allowed to recover only that percentage of damage caused by the other person. Under the much fairer comparative fault standard, an injured person would still be able to collect a percentage of an insurance settlement to cover medical bills and compensate for injuries. Now, these victims get nothing.

 

 

SUPPORT BILL HB 813 - for injured people

State lawmakers are preparing to vote on legislation that will impact anyone who is hurt in a car accident or suffers a personal injury that is someone else’s fault.

North Carolina is one of only four states that allow the doctrine of contributory negligence as a defense in auto accident and other personal injury cases. Contributory negligence is a harsh and outdated way of denying help to people hurt in accidents. Under current law, if you’re even 1 percent responsible for an accident, you CANNOT recover damages from the person who injured you, even if that person is 99 percent at fault.

HB 813 seeks to correct that injustice by switching from contributory negligence to comparative fault. Under the comparative fault doctrine, juries determine how much fault lies with each party in the accident and then award damages based on those percentages. The injured party is allowed to recover only that percentage of damage caused by the other person. Under the much fairer comparative fault standard, an injured person would still be able to collect a percentage of an insurance settlement to cover medical bills and compensate for injuries. Now, these victims get nothing.

It could happen to you or someone you love.

Imagine that you’re driving home after picking up your child from school or coming home from a dinner date with your spouse. You have the green light, but just as you’re crossing through the intersection, another car runs the red light. You see their headlights and you know the other driver isn’t going to stop. But in the nanoseconds leading up to the crash, you don’t swerve and you don’t blow your horn. Because all you can think about is your loved one.

The other driver’s insurance company will argue that because you saw the car coming, and didn’t do anything to prevent the collision, you were partially at fault for the accident. Because of contributory negligence, that’s enough to kill your claim and leave you saddled with medical bills resulting from the crash. All while the other driver’s insurance company gets off scot-free.

How little can 1 percent be? In North Carolina, insurance companies have used contributory negligence to deny auto accident claims because the injured person:

  • Failed to honk when passing another vehicle that sideswiped them
  • Failed to look both ways when passing through an intersection with a green light and then was T-boned by another car whose driver ran a red light
  • Failed to slam on the brakes in the seconds before another car slammed into theirs

 

Though someone else was clearly at fault in each of these examples, the victims weren’t able to collect insurance payments for their injuries because they were slightly responsible for these accidents. Does that seem fair?

We don’t think so either. That’s why we’re asking you to call, email or write your elected officials in the N.C. Senate and tell them to SUPPORT HB 813! The bill has already been approved by the state House, and the state Senate is expected to vote on the measure during the current session of the North Carolina General Assembly.

It’s very important that you let your state senators know how you feel and how you want them to vote on this bill. The insurance industry is lobbying them aggressively to keep the current doctrine of contributory negligence. They’re twisting the facts, spreading misinformation and spending thousands every week on an advertising campaign aimed at killing HB 813.

You may have heard their radio commercials claiming that automobile insurance rates will go up if the proposed legislation becomes law. That’s simply not true. Insurance lobbyists are distorting the truth to protect their industry's profits at the expense of what's fair for everyone.

FACT:
Before neighboring states South Carolina and Tennessee switched from contributory negligence to comparative fault, auto insurance premiums were much higher there than in North Carolina. Since the change, premiums in those states have increased at a much slower rate than premiums in North Carolina.

The insurance companies also assert that more accident claims will be paid if this new law passes. We certainly hope that’s the case because accident victims in North Carolina have too long been denied fair compensation for their injuries. It’s important to remember that with comparative fault, victims won’t be getting money they don’t deserve. Insurance settlements will be determined by each person’s level of fault.

Victims finally will be getting the justice they deserve after more than a century of unfairness under contributory negligence, a standard designed to protect insurers at the expense of suffering people.

Finally, we have a chance to protect the victims of personal injuries.

Please, contact your elected officials today and ask them to support HB 813. Tell them that current law is too harsh and needs to be reformed. You’ll find contact information for North Carolina’s state senators at the end of this letter. You can learn more about the fight for fair justice in North Carolina by visiting www.fairjusticenc.com.

Thanks for your help in passing this much-needed reform that protects injured people. This is a law that could impact all of us

Tell Your State Senators to Vote for HB 813

The N.C. General Assembly is considering important legislation that will impact anyone who is hurt in  in an automobile accident or suffers from a personal injury.

We need you to call, write or email your state senators as soon as possible and tell them to support HB 813, which would change the standard in personal injury cases from contributory negligence to comparative fault.

We'll be writing more about this issue in the coming days, but here's a quick primer on what's at stake, courtesy of  North Carolina Advocates for Justice.

All of us expect our civil justice system to be fair, but in North Carolina it's not. Unfortunately, insurance lobbyists want to keep it that way with empty scare tactics.

Our state is one of only four that clings to contributory negligence, a harsh and outdated way of denying help to people hurt in accidents. Under "contrib," even if you are only 1% percent responsible for an accident, you cannot recover damages from someone 99% responsible.

Comparative fault, used in 46 states, allows people to recover damages from those most responsible for causing an accident. It's a fair system that does not mean a rise in premiums.

The bipartisan House Bill 813 aims to introduce comparative fault as the new and improved law of the land. But insurance lobbyists are trying to stop this change by distorting the facts. Unlike what insurance lobbyists say, neighboring states with comparative fault have seen premium rates slow down.

Follow this link to find out who represents who in the state senate and how to get in touch with them.

VIP for a VIP brings reality of fatal crashes to high school campuses

Given yesterday's post about the dangers of distracted driving, specifically texting while driving, I thought it would be a good time to highlight VIP for a VIP, an organization that Deuterman Law Group supports.

The Guilford County organization uses dramatic crash re-enactments to educate teens about safe driving.

VIP for a VIP (which is short for Vehicle Injury Prevention for a Very Important Person) was founded in 1998 by two off-duty Greensboro firefighters, Steve Zimmerman and Larry Cockman came upon a fatal accident involving a teen driver. In the days following the accident, the men struggled with the senseless loss they had witnessed and decided to develop a program that would bringing the reality of a fatal crash to high school students.

You can check out the group's schedule to see if your school or a school near you will be staging a VIP for a VIP crash reenactment. If not, we encourage you to contact VIP for a VIP on behalf of your school because we firmly believe these demonstrations save lives. You can also make a donation online, which helps fund reenactments at schools throughout North Carolina.

Texting While Driving Has Deadly Consequences

North Carolina has banned texting while driving, but have you?

We understand how tempting it is to reach for your phone when you hear a beep alerting you that a new text message or email has arrived. You'll just take a quick peek. You'll barely take your eyes off the road. And besides, you're a careful driver.

But a few seconds are all it takes to end your life or someone else's.

As the New York Times reports:

Studies suggest that drivers who send or receive a text message tend to take their eyes off the road for about five seconds, enough time for a vehicle going at highway speed to travel more than 100 yards. The Virginia Tech Transportation Institute found that truckers sending text messages are 23 times more likely to cause a crash or near-crash than a nontexting trucker.

Is any email or text message that important? Are you willing to risk your life or someone else's to read a message or send it?

The sad fact is that for millions of drivers every day, the answer is yes. When you're out driving today, take a look around. We bet you'll see someone fiddling with a cell phone when their eyes should be on the road.

Despite state laws banning the practice and the efforts of awareness campaigns, texting and other forms of distracted driving are an epidemic in this country. We've become addicted to technology and connectedness, and we're sacrificing our safety and others because of it.

How do we get the message across that texting while driving is unsafe? The statistics certainly back up that claim. The Huffington Post reports:

According to the Harvard Center of Risk Analysis, cell phone use contributes to 6 percent of all crashes, which equates to 636,000 crashes, 330,000 injuries, and 2600 deaths each year.

 

A British PSA aimed at teen drivers takes a more graphic approach:

 

This graphic British video is fiction, but this video from txtresponsibly vividly describes the aftermath of a fatal automobile accident in Utah, caused by a teen who was texting while driving.

 

Continue Reading